Page 21 - Index
P. 21

mass with flap=7 degrees, the   tailplane efficiency factor
        variation of pitching from 1.0   decreases.
        (100%) to 0.5 (50%), the effects
        of icing on the aircraft tailplane
        were simulated (see Figure   Dynamic Stability
        7). The results show that the   For model validation purpos-
        pitching moment versus angle   es, the longitudinal dynamics
        of attack gradient decreases as   were analyzed by excitation of
        the horizontal tailplane efficien-  the short-period and long-pe-
        cy decreases therefore aircraft   riod modes using the eigen-
        static stability also decreases as   vectors (specific to modes) of
        horizontal tailplane efficiency   Matrix A to specify initial con-
        decreases.                   ditions. The variables simulat-
          The results also show that   ed were relative changes (var-
        the angle of attack for trimmed   iations with respect to a trim
        flight conditions increases as   condition). The results show
        tailplane efficiency decreases.   that for a horizontal tailplane
        Analysis of horizontal tailplane   efficiency of 100% the aircraft
        efficiency versus stick-fixed   is statically and dynamically   Figure 7. Pitch stability—pitching moment versus angle of attack.
        static margin suggests that static   stable with heavy and moder-
        margin decreases as the horizon-  ate damping for the short-pe-
        tal tailplane efficiency decreases   riod oscillation (SPO) and
        and that the aircraft is neutrally   long-period oscillation (LPO),
        (statically) stable when the hori-
        zontal tailplane efficiency is ap-  respectively. In addition, the
        proximately 0.68 for the generic   model was independently ver-
        business jet model in given flight   ified by comparing results to
        conditions (see Figure 8).   a reduced order mode. When
          Further analysis of elevator   the efficiency is reduced to
        deflection versus horizontal   80%, the response for the LPO
        tailplane efficiency (see Figure   is also stable, although with
        9) suggests that increasing up   less damping of oscillations
        elevator (-VE deflection) is   than the 100% efficiency case
        required to maintain trimmed   (see Figure 10, page 22). The
        flight as the horizontal tailplane   results of the dynamic stability
        efficiency decreases. The range   are in agreement with those of   Figure 8. Elevator deflection versus tailplane efficiency.
        of elevator deflection for the   the static stability analysis.
        generic business jet model was
        20 degrees up and 15 degrees   Effects of Flap Retraction
        down. The results suggest that   The results of a flap retrac-
        as horizontal tailplane efficiency
        decreases below approximately   tion following a simulated
        0.2 (20%), there is insufficient up   tailplane stall (see Figure 11,
        elevator to maintain trimmed   page 22) were analyzed with
        flight.                      the tailplane efficiency of
          In summary, using estab-   100% and the flap deflection
        lished theory and aircraft design   of 7 degrees. At t=4 seconds, a
        application software for a given   tailplane stall was modeled by
        generic business jet model, it   a step reduction of 50% to the
        was shown that               horizontal tailplane efficiency,
          •  static stability decreases as   which destabilizes the system
            tailplane efficiency factor   response. The aircraft pitches
            decreases.
                                     down (-30 degrees) within
          •  static margin decreases as   2 seconds. At t=6 seconds,
            tailplane efficiency factor   the retraction of flaps from 7
            decreases.               degrees to 0 degrees initially   Figure 9. Tailplane efficiency factor versus static margin.
          •  neutral static stability is at   helps, but not sufficiently to
            approximately 68% tailplane   stabilize the response with   efficiency a large 20-degree elevator down during 1 second is
            efficiency factor.       50% tailplane efficiency. The   needed to initiate a large magnitude but stable phugoid response,
          •  negative static stability is   effect of tailplane efficiency   which is shown during the first 20 seconds for comparison pur-
                                                                poses.
            at 20% airplane efficiency   on the initial response to a 1   At 50% efficiency, a 1 second 2-degree elevator down input
            factor.                  second elevator impulse (see   destabilizes the system with oscillations, and at 20% efficiency,
          •  increasing up elevator (-VE)   Figure 13, page 23) shows that   1-degree elevator down is sufficient to produce very fast diver-
            is required to compensate as   at 100% horizontal tailplane   gence without oscillations. Load factor changes with 1 second el-
                                                                                 October-December 2021 ISASI Forum  •  21
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26