Page 24 - Forum-2020-JulyToSeptember
P. 24

mand” (RPIC) to control and maintain   inconsequential precedent of permitting   be allowed to continue. From a “preven-
        situational awareness in the operation   some activities that are known to be more   tion” perspective, this is by no means an
        of the unmanned aircraft. Unless an   hazardous than others based on “societal   inconsequential part of the landscape.
        unmanned aircraft is explicitly designed   benefits” asserted to justify them.   There is no doubt that some types of
        and expensively equipped to clear its own   As the International Civil Aviation Or-  aviation operations undoubtedly are safer
        flight path, it must have either a func-  ganization (ICAO) UAS Toolkit observes,   to carry out using unmanned aircraft
        tioning datalink or totally segregated or   “As a regulator, recognizing the societal   than is the case with manned aircraft,
        protected airspace to allow the RPIC to   benefits of UAS and the need to facilitate   even using relatively simple RPAS. It also
        avoid in-flight conflicts or even midair   operations in a safe manner are key and   is undeniable that the lack of a human
        collisions with other aircraft. Clearly,   include humanitarian efforts, search   life at risk aboard an unmanned aircraft
        unmanned aircraft are different from   and rescue, firefighting, infrastructure   allows a different perspective on how
        manned aircraft, right?              monitoring, and research and develop-  and from what platform such operations
          The real-world perspective on these   ment [R&D]. Operations limited to VLOS   should be carried out. To date, only a bare
        differences—each of which represents a   [visual line of sight] operations may limit   handful of accidents has been attribut-
        limitation that is not necessarily com-  benefits obtained by carrying loads or   ed to manned and unmanned aircraft
        patible with how the current aviation   discharging substances (e.g., crop dusting,   sharing the same airspace while operat-
        system works—is more nuanced, seeking   insect control).” Of course, this perspec-  ing under different rules. However, such
        to accommodate unmanned aircraft     tive sidesteps such practical implementa-  occurrences are easy to envision as UAS
        despite their limitations. However, such a   tion considerations as both manned and   operations become more common as long
        supportive approach also provides poten-  unmanned aircraft performing the same   as manned and unmanned aircraft are
        tially unwarranted latitude to unmanned   operations in the same airspace at the   regulated and operated differently.
        aircraft for shortcomings that would be   same time and is essentially silent on the
        completely unacceptable for manned   larger question of risk.             Thinking About the “Manned” Past to
        aircraft.                              In 1962, ISASI’s esteemed founder,
          In many states, an unmanned aircraft   Jerome Lederer, presented a lecture on   Prepare for the “Unmanned” Future
        simply is, by definition, “an aircraft.”   “Perspectives in Air Safety” on his receipt   At this point, it may be best to restate
        Various qualifiers often are added to that   of the Daniel Guggenheim Medal from   the first of the two questions asked at the
        fundamental proposition to account for   the American Society of Mechanical   start of this paper as “In what ways do
        the limitations mentioned above, but the   Engineers. He asked a number of ques-  UAS need to be more or less the same, in
        idea behind starting with the same basic   tions about risk throughout this talk, all   terms of capabilities and operating rules,
        definition is that existing operating rules   of which resonate in the current debate   as manned aircraft in the interests of avi-
        and certification standards rules can (and   about unmanned aviation; for example,   ation safety?” To date, there is no general-
        should) be applied equally, regardless of   when considering instances in which a   ly accepted answer to this question. This
        whether an aircraft has a pilot aboard or   production aircraft is found to need a   is fertile ground for exploring through the
        on the surface of the earth.         safety-related modification.         lessons of manned aviation and historical
          This ideal environment has yet to be   The aviation industry resents and   accidents.
        achieved. There is little motivation on   protests overregulation and is prone to   To start with, consider two proposi-
        the part of the unmanned aviation sector   combat detailed regulation of the nature   tions:
        to pursue it, especially to the extent that   that would have overcome such a defi-  •  What has come to be considered a
        mandatory equipage associated with spe-  ciency. But what is the Federal Aviation   shared perspective on aviation safe-
                                                                                     ty—a common basis for a “safety cul-
        cific classes of airspace would cost money   Administration (FAA) to do when it finds   ture”—is not shared by the unmanned
        to install and more money to make oper-  good safety practices developed by one   aviation sector except to the extent it
        ate through satellite-based datalinks or   organization not adopted by others, yet   is obliged to conform to it.
        terrestrial networks. It also would reduce   both comply with the regulations?
        range, endurance, useful payload, or all   Should the government, in such cases,   •  A complex system like aviation is only
        of the above. To the unmanned aviation   step in retroactively to correct a known   as safe as its least safe component.
        sector, “integration” often is seen simply   hazardous situation by changing the   The first proposition might be hot-
        as an alternate term for “access to desired   regulation, making it more specific?   ly contested by the more professional
        airspace,” not participation in the existing   One should it be careful not to discour-  operators and manufacturers of UAS.
        aviation system.                     age original thinking, imagination, and   They could argue, rightly, that they do
          One of the major advantages of un-  ingenuity, which may lead to improved   whatever is asked of them to gain access
        manned aircraft systems (UAS) is that   practices? Should the public, therefore, be   to airspace. This is true but somewhat
        they cost less to build, less to maintain,   asked to assume some risks for the sake   disingenuous. Unmanned aircraft cannot
        and less to operate than manned aircraft.   of progress? The solution to such prob-  conform to many rules of certification
        These savings often are achieved at the   lems should not lie entirely in the domain   or operation currently in force, meaning
        expense of being significantly less capable   of government regulation in a free society.  they must seek permission to operate
        than the manned aircraft whose airspace   It is important to acknowledge that a   that is conditioned by mitigations for
        they share. However, in facilitating more   very high–level risk decision has already   their various limitations (or that simply
        widespread operations of RPAS regard-  been made regarding unmanned aircraft   accepts the increased risk associated with
        less of their differences, there is the not   operations: they are permissible and will   them). Since unmanned aviation busi-
        24  •   July-September 2020 ISASI Forum
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29